Technique and Outcomes of Concomitant Aortic and Caval Resection and Reconstruction for Retroperitoneal Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Major vascular involvement is often considered a contraindication to resection of malignant tumors, but in highly selected patients, it can be performed safely, with results that are highly dependent upon the tumor biology. Resection of both the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) is a rare undertaking, requiring both favorable tumor biology and a patient fit for a substantial surgical insult; nevertheless, it provides the possibility of a cure. METHODS: Patients requiring resection and reconstruction of both the aorta and IVC from 2009 through 2019 at 2 university medical centers were included. Patient characteristics, operative technique, and outcomes were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: We identified 9 patients, all with infrarenal reconstruction or repair of the aorta and IVC. All cases were performed with systemic heparinization and required simultaneous aortic and caval cross-clamping for tumor resection. No temporary venous or arterial bypass was used. Since arterial reperfusion with the IVC clamped was poorly tolerated in 1 patient, venous reconstruction was typically completed first. Primary repair was performed in 1 patient, while 8 required replacements. In 2 patients, aortic homograft was used for replacement of both the aortoiliac and iliocaval segments in contaminated surgical fields. In the remaining 6, Dacron was used for arterial replacement; either Dacron (n = 2) or polytetrafluoroethylene (n = 4) were used for venous replacement. Patients were discharged after a median stay of 8 days (range: 5-16). At median follow-up of 17 months (range 3-79 months), 2 patients with paraganglioma and 1 patient with Leydig cell carcinoma had cancer recurrences. Venous reconstructions occluded in 3 patients (38%), although symptoms were minimal. One patient presented acutely with a thrombosed iliac artery limb and bilateral common iliac artery anastomotic stenoses, treated successfully with thrombolysis and stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumor involving both the aorta and IVC can be successfully treated with resection and reconstruction. En bloc tumor resection, restoration of venous return before arterial reconstruction, and most importantly, careful patient selection, all contribute to positive outcomes in this otherwise incurable population.

Thoracic Aortic Injuries Following Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Placement: A Retrospective Case Series.

Thoracic aortic injuries from intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are rare, and no publications exist in the context of patients awaiting heart transplantation. We present a single-institution case series involving five patients out of 107 who sustained thoracic aortic injuries following IABP placement awaiting heart transplantation. The goal of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients, presenting symptoms, treatment and the impact of these injuries on their suitability for transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-institution study through chart review of five patients with known thoracic aortic injuries following IABP placement awaiting heart transplant. SETTING: Tertiary care academic teaching hospital with all patients requiring cardiac ICU admission. PATIENTS: All five patients were diagnosed with advanced heart failure awaiting heart transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: Each patient had an IABP placed while awaiting transplant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Five patients (4.6%) out of a total of 107 supported with IABP awaiting heart transplantation were identified with thoracic aortic injury. Three underwent transplantation and subsequently received thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and they are doing well with a mean follow-up of 6 months. One patient died acutely and the other did not require intervention. CONCLUSIONS: IABP-related aortic injuries may be more common in patients awaiting transplantation and that endovascular therapy is a suitable treatment modality with no immediate impact on transplantation outcomes. Pooled data from multiple centers may help identify patients risk profile to potentially design an algorithm that can more quickly identify these injuries.